What is true, and what is not yet.
A company that builds tools to fit the person using them cannot ship a website that is hostile to the people it serves. This page says exactly where this site stands, including the parts that are unfinished.
This website
Text and background colors meet WCAG 2.1 AA contrast on light and dark sections alike, and the palette was chosen for that rather than adjusted after the fact.
Status is never signalled by color alone. Every element that carries meaning carries it in words.
There is a skip link, one first-level heading per page, headings in order, and landmark regions, so a screen reader or keyboard user can move by structure.
Every link, button, and form field shows a visible focus ring, including on the dark sections, where a second ring style is used so it stays visible.
The site honors the reduce-motion setting in your operating system.
Line length is capped near sixty-eight characters and line height is set for reading rather than for density.
The layout works from a phone up, and text can be enlarged by your browser without breaking the page.
What has not been done
This site has not been audited by an outside accessibility firm, and it has not been tested with a wide range of assistive technology or by people who rely on it daily. Those are different things from building it carefully, and we are not going to claim one when we did the other.
Daily, the app, has not had an accessibility audit. Its design is deep on cognitive load, one decision on screen at a time, bounded choices, text labels on every icon, no alarm styling on a miss. Its screen reader support, dynamic type behavior, and contrast have not been formally verified. We will say so until they have been.
If something here does not work for you
Tell us and we will fix it, and we would rather hear it bluntly than not at all. Write to [email protected] with what happened and what you were using, and a person will answer.
This statement is dated 12 August 2026 and describes ttaksoftware.com.